English
Charter challenge of forced psychiatric treatment filed in BC Supreme Court
Community Legal Assistance Society
providing specialized legal assistance to promote social justice since I971
Charter challenge of forced psychiatric treatment filed in BC Supreme Court
For release September 13, 2016 at 12:00 AM (PST)
Media Advisory - National Forum for Robust Safeguards in Bill C -14 - Ottawa: Thursday June 16
Canadians with disabilities are calling upon lawmakers to limit medically assisted death to persons at the end of life, who are free from inducement and fully informed of all medical and social interventions that could ease their suffering. On Thursday June 16th, join a Community Forum for Robust Safeguards in Bill C-14 hosted by the National Disability Rights Community. We will let Parliamentarians know what is at stake for disabled Canadians and their families. This event continues a national conversation, launched by the National Disability Rights Community.
Share Your Voice: Community Forum for Robust Safeguards in Bill C-14 Thursday, June 16th
Be strong. Be safe. Be heard. Canadians with disabilities are calling upon lawmakers to limit medically assisted death to persons at the end of life, who are free from inducement and fully informed of all medical and social interventions that could ease their suffering.
CCD Chairperson's Update - March/April 2016
In this edition of the Update, I am sharing the highlights of key meetings and presentations made over the past few weeks by the CCD team.
A Modernised Court Challenges Program of Canada: A perspective from the Council of Canadians with Disabilities
Presented to:
Standing Committee on Access to Justice and Human Rights
For its study on Access to the Justice System
42nd Parliament, 1st Session
April 19, 2016
Appearance by:
John Rae
Anne Levesque
Written by
Joëlle Pastora Sala
Anne Levesque
On Behalf of the
Broadening the Electoral Reform Discussion
by John Rae
This blog originally appeared on the Broadbent Institute’s website.
The Liberal government campaigned on electoral reform, promising “that 2015 will be the last federal election conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system” and that they “will make every vote count.”
Bill C-14 Does Not Go Far Enough to Protect Vulnerable Canadians
April 15, 2016 │ For Immediate Release
With Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), the Government of Canada pushed back from the recommendations in "Medical Assistance in Dying: A Patient-Centered Approach," the report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, which went beyond the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Carter case, but the Government did not push back far enough.
CCD Chairperson's Update - Highlights from CCD's 40 Years
We're celebrating our 40th Anniversary!
The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) was founded in 1976 as an organization of people with disabilities working for people with disabilities. CCD was first known as the Coalition of Provincial Organizations of the Handicapped (COPOH), but, in 1994, when its membership structure changed to include national organizations of people with disabilities, a new name was adopted - the Council of Canadians with Disabilities.
Chairperson's Update - Ending of Life Ethics
Medical Experts and National Organizations Endorse Special Safeguards to Protect Vulnerable Canadians in Right-to-Die Legislation
On March 15, 2016, many of us read a CBC report that a Manitoba court had given permission for a Manitoban to be provided medical aid in dying, also referred to as assisted suicide, and then the next day the media covered an Ontario case. Earlier this month, courts in Alberta and Ontario granted constitutional exemptions. In the province of Quebec, people have been receiving medical aid in dying since December 2015. You may be wonde
Vulnerable Persons Standard
Dear Colleague:
Parliament is currently considering how to implement assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada. Members are working from a set of recommendations that go far beyond what was considered in the Carter decision. The recommendations would: