English

Don't get depressed in Oregon

By Susan Martinuk

(3 March 1999) — This article is reprinted from the National Post, March 1, 1999

Two basic tenets that underlie arguments to legalize euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are an individual's right to self-determination and the easy establishment of safeguards to regulate these practices.

Genereux Case Factum

Court File Nos. C29797 & C29940

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant/Respondent

- and -

MAURICE GENEREUX

Appellant/Respondent

- and -

COUNCIL OF CANADIANS WITH DISABILITIES

Intervenor


FACTUM OF THE INTERVENOR



Families across country feel Latimer ruling better protects life of people with disabilities

(15 February 1999) — In an action the Saskatchewan Association for Community Living (SACL), calls appropriate, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal recently overturned a lower court's unprecedented two year sentence given to Robert Latimer for killing his daughter, Tracy, who had cerebral palsy. Latimer had been convicted of second-degree murder, but the judge created an exemption to the mandatory 10-year sentence and gave Latimer only two — only one of which to be served in prison.

Hugh Scher Swears Affidavit in Genereux Case

(8 January 1999) — CCD is seeking to intervene in the Genereux case. In its affidavit, CCD outlined its general position on the Genereux case to the court. CCD's position is summarized below:

People with disabilities are frequently victimized by prejudicial, paternalistic and stereotypical ideas about the quality of our existence. This is true for people who are HIV positive and/or are living with AIDS and for people who depend on doctors and care givers for survival and nurturing.

The Latimer Case: The Reflections of People with Disabilities - Introduction

by Hugh R. Scher, Chairperson, CCD Human Rights Committee

Annual Report: 1998-1999

Making Change Work for Us

Submitted by Eric Norman

Syndicate content